libauto and application.library

Have a question about our Software Developer Kit? Ask them here.

Re: libauto and application.library

Postby salass00 » Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:31 pm

whose wrote:Maybe it´s time for a second .xml then, although they are identical in form and function? Sometimes it´s better to break SDK compatibility then to make coder´s live harder (I don´t think that there is so much vital OS4 code that makes use of the CIA resources).


New programs should use "timer.device" instead. Also CIA chips are only available on classic machines so I don't think it's worth fixing something that no-one will use anyway.

As I said before it makes no sense to generate a libauto from *all* the interface xml files (some are h/w dependent, some may use per task library bases, others may not be for general application use at all). Better would be to just have a list of common OS libraries that the libauto is generated from where new libraries can easily be added or removed as needed.
User avatar
salass00
AmigaOS Core Developer
AmigaOS Core Developer
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:12 pm
Location: Finland

Re: libauto and application.library

Postby ssolie » Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:50 pm

salass00 wrote:Better would be to just have a list of common OS libraries that the libauto is generated from where new libraries can easily be added or removed as needed.

The current list lives in the Migration Guide at http://wiki.amigaos.net/wiki/Migration_ ... _Libraries
AmigaOS Development Team Lead
Be authentic. Get AmigaOS.
User avatar
ssolie
AmigaOS Core Developer
AmigaOS Core Developer
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:51 pm
Location: Canada

Previous

Return to SDK Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest